Choroidal structural changes following vitrectomy performed with phacoemulsification in unilateral idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine the influence of vitrectomy combined with macular epiretinal membrane dissection and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and phacoemulsification on choroidal vasculature in patients with unilateral idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IERM) and concurrent cataract using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: This retrospective study included 26 eyes of 26 patients (8 males and 18 females) with unilateral IERM without vitreomacular traction (VMT) (group 1) and the patients' fellow eyes (n = 26, group 2). Three-port 25-G pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with macular epiretinal membrane dissection and ILM peeling and phacoemulsification was performed on all patients. The comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations of all patients involved OCT measurements at every visit before and after surgery, and the choroidal thickness (CT), central macular thickness (CMT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were calculated. RESULTS: The mean age of the IERM patients was 66.58 ± 7.06 years. Postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly greater than baseline (P = 0.023). The CVI of the IERM eyes was significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that of the fellow eyes at baseline. The subfoveal CT in the IERM eyes was lower than that in the fellow eyes (P = 0.023), but there was, no significant difference in the average CT between the two groups at baseline (P = 0.071). In eyes with IERM, the CVI significantly increased at 1 week, 1 month (P < 0.001), and 3 months (P = 0.049) postoperatively, the subfoveal CT was markedly thickened 1 month after surgery (P = 0.001), the temporal 3 mm and nasal CT significantly increased at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (P = 0.041, P = 0.022 for temporal 3 mm; P < 0.001, P = 0.047 for nasal 1.5 mm; P = 0.01, P = 0.001 for nasal 3 mm), and only the temporal 3 mm CT increased significantly at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.017). The baseline CMT of the IERM eyes was significantly thicker than that of the fellow eyes (P < 0.001). CMT significantly decreased at 3 months postoperatively in IERM eyes(P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the CVI in the IERM eyes without VMT after combined PPV with ILM peeling and phacoemulsification persists for at least 3 months.

Comparison of choroidal thickness in high myopic eyes after FS-LASIK versus implantable collamer lens implantation with swept-source optical coherence tomography.

AIM: To investigate the changes in choroidal thickness (CT) in high myopic eyes after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery or central hole implantable collamer lens (ICL V4c) implantation using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS: We examined the right eyes of 116 patients with high myopia who were candidates for FS-LASIK surgery and ICL implantation. Sixty eyes underwent ICL V4c implantation and 56 eyes were subjected to FS-LASIK surgery. The CT was measured with SS-OCT. All data were recorded preoperatively and 2h, 1wk, 1 and 3mo postoperatively. Other demographic information was collected, including age, sex, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), intraocular pressure (IOP) and axial length (AL). RESULTS: The UCVA improved in both groups and showed no significant differences between groups. There also were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative BCVA and SE (P=0.581 and 0.203, respectively). The foveal CTs, inner nasal and outer nasal CTs were significantly thicker at 2h postoperatively in both groups (P<0.05) but returned to baseline levels in 1wk; after 1mo, no significant differences were found relative to the preoperative values. At 3mo in each group, nine regions showed variations in the CT as compared with preoperative thickening, but only the foveal and nasal area CTs preoperative differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in 9 regions of CT between the two groups at all follow-up times (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The CTs after ICL implantation and FS-LASIK surgery are significantly thicker than those before operation, especially in the foveal and nasal areas, but there is no significant difference between the two methods.

Intraocular Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Subretinal Injection Compared with Intravitreal Application of Conbercept in Vitrectomized Rabbit Eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ocular pharmacokinetic properties of subretinal conbercept injection in vitrectomized rabbit eyes and to compare them with those by intravitreal injection. METHODS: The following groups of New Zealand white rabbits received conbercept injections (0.5 mg/0.05 ml): a subretinal group (subretinal injection in vitrectomized eyes), an intravitreal group (intravitreal injection in vitrectomized eyes), and a control group (intravitreal injection in nonvitrectomized eyes). Drug concentrations in the aqueous humor (AH), the vitreous humor (VH), and the retina were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Ophthalmic B-ultrasonography, electroretinogram (ERG), and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were performed to evaluate the safety of subretinal injection. RESULTS: On the 28th day after injection, the drug level in the subretinal group was significantly higher than that in the intravitreal group in the AH (0.90 ± 0.25 µg/ml and 0.11 ± 0.07 µg/ml and 0.11 ± 0.07 P < 0.001, respectively) and the VH (5.00 ± 3.86 µg/ml and 0.11 ± 0.07 µg/ml and 0.11 ± 0.07 P < 0.001, respectively) and the VH (5.00 ± 3.86 P < 0.001, respectively) and the VH (5.00 ± 3.86 P < 0.001, respectively) and the VH (5.00 ± 3.86 . CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that applying conbercept by subretinal injection can reduce the drug clearance rate and sustain a long maintenance period in ocular tissue, which suggests that subretinal conbercept injection may be a potentially valuable treatment option.

Intraocular pharmacokinetics of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents by intraoperative subretinal versus intravitreal injection in silicone oil-filled eyes of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized controlled pilot study.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative subretinal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections have been used clinically in some case, but the pharmacokinetic characteristics have not yet been determined. In this pilot study, we investigate the pharmacokinetic parameters of anti-VEGF agents by intraoperative subretinal or intravitreal injection in silicone oil (SiO)-filled eyes of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS: Randomized controlled trial including 13 patients (16 eyes) with PDR underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with SiO tamponade and randomly received a subretinal (8 eyes) or intravitreal (8 eyes) conbercept injection (0.5 mg/0.05 ml) intraoperatively. Aqueous humour (AH) was obtained on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 10th, 14th, 21st and 28th day after the injection. Drug concentrations in the AH were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The last best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was examined 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The clearance rate of anti-VEGF agents by subretinal injection was reduced in vitrectomized eyes with SiO tamponade (p < 0.05). With the same drug dose, subretinal injection (5.49 ± 6.11 µg/ml) resulted in higher drug concentrations in the AH when compared with intravitreal injection (0.42 ± 0.46 µg/ml, p = 0.001) 4 weeks after the treatment. The mean residence time last (MRT0-t ) by subretinal injection (11.57 ± 0.83 days) was significantly longer than the mean MRT0-t by intravitreal injection (7.10 ± 1.00 days, p < 0.001). A self-paired analysis showed that subretinal injection led to the BCVA improvement by +28.59 letters 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.028) while the BCVA did not improve significantly by intravitreal injection (p = 0.715). CONCLUSIONS: The drug maintenance phase was prolonged by intraoperative subretinal injection in SiO-filled eyes of PDR. The results suggest that subretinal injection might be a valuable treatment option for the management of PDR.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Visual Function in Patients With Orbital Fracture by Visual Electrophysiology and Visual Field Examination.

OBJECTIVE: At present, the effect of the visual electrophysiology and vision field examination in patients with orbital blowout fracture is rarely studied. So, the authors investigate the value of visual electrophysiology and vision field examination in the diagnosis of ocular contusion. METHODS: The position and range of fracture of 81 patients were determined by computed tomography (CT) scanning. Visual evoked potential (VEP), electroretinogram (ERG), and mfERG were vision field examination detected in 81 patients and the results were compared with those of contralateral healthy eyes. In addition, visual electrophysiology and vision field examination in diagnosis of eye contusion was analyzed and the correlation of the VEP, ERG, mfERG injury duration, and visual acuity was further analyzed. RESULTS: The visual acuity of orbital fractures was significantly decreased compared with that in the uninjured eyes (t = 2.181, P = 0.032). Compared injured eyes and normal eyes in 54 patients, b wave of Max-ERG and Cone-ERG implied value extension (t = -2.426, P = 0.025; t = -2.942, P = 0.014), P-VEP P100 Peak duration and amplitude significantly extended (t = 3.162, P = 0.007; t = 9.314, P = 0.000), and F-VEP P1 amplitude decreased significantly (t = 3.362, P = 0.004). mfERG showed that the injured eye central reaction was significantly decreased (t = 8.727, P = 0.000). There was a significant correlation between P-VEP P100 amplitude and visual acuity (r = 0.067, P = 0.000). But there was no significant correlation between the P100 peak value, amplitude of P-VEP, mfERG central reaction, and injured days, respectively. There was significant difference between 2 groups with average visual acuity and mean defect value (t = 3.253, 3.461, P = 0.006, 0.003). There was statistical means the difference in P-VEP abnormal group, visual field abnormal group, and combined detection abnormal groups, the abnormal rate increased significantly (χ = 3.931, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Orbital floor fracture can lead to optic nerve damage and also may be associated with decreased macular function. The combination analysis of visual electrophysiology and vision field examination is beneficial to early diagnosis of ocular trauma and can improve the positive rate in clinic practice.